"Peter Webb" wrote in message
u...
|
| "Androcles" wrote in message
| ...
|
| "Peter Webb" wrote in message
| u...
| |
| | "Androcles" wrote in message
| | news | |
| | "Peter Webb" wrote in message
| | u...
| | |
| | | "Androcles" wrote in message
| | | ...
| | |
| | | "Peter Webb" wrote in
| message
| | | ...
| | | |
| | | | "Androcles" wrote in message
| | | | ...
| | | |
| | | | "Quadibloc" wrote in message
| | | |
| | |
| |
| ...
| | | | | Google "Minkowski diagram",
| | | |
| | | | **** off, time is not a vector.
| | | |
| | | | Nor is distance.
| | |
| | | Which is shorter, London to Sydney or Sydney to London?
| | |
| | |
| | | They are the same.
| |
| | So you don't believe in the experimental predictions of relativity?
| |
| |
| | That does not follow.
|
| See Hafele-Keating, they flew clocks around the world and it is shorter
| from
| London to Sydney than Sydney to London. Distance is a vector, time is
not.
| So you don't believe in the experimental predictions of relativity?
|
|
| Distance is no more a vector than time is.

Is velocity a vector, ****head?

So you don't believe in the experimental predictions of relativity?