View Single Post
  #6  
Old October 15th 10, 01:57 PM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.history
Jeff Findley
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 5,012
Default NASA changing opinion on the Direct HLV launcher.

In article c77eb576-c0cb-4e67-83bd-6a088aae7d08
@i5g2000yqe.googlegroups.com, says...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/ETDHLRLV
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31261680/Etdhlrlv-Addendum
http://www.scribd.com/doc/35439593/S...-Satellite-GEO

I have proposed a privately funded $12 billion program - $7 billion
for the launcher, $5 billion for the satellite - to place a satellite
that beams 10,000 MW to Earth. At $0.05 per kWh the satellite is
worth over $75 billion the day its switched on.


You've proposed napkin drawings with nothing to support them.

Jeff
--
42