View Single Post
  #2  
Old October 15th 10, 12:26 AM posted to sci.space.policy,sci.astro,sci.physics,sci.space.history
Brad Guth[_3_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 15,175
Default NASA changing opinion on the Direct HLV launcher.

On Oct 14, 1:31*pm, William Mook wrote:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30943696/E...-Satellite-GEO

I have proposed a privately funded $12 billion program - $7 billion
for the launcher, $5 billion for the satellite - to place a satellite
that beams 10,000 MW to Earth. *At $0.05 per kWh the satellite is
worth over $75 billion the day its switched on.


Why are you passing up my 50/50 deal of public funding?

At least that's what I'd offer if I were in charge, and at least that
way you'd also get full access to all public funded R&D, as well as
public owned logistics (including DoD stuff).

~ BG