View Single Post
  #8  
Old September 12th 10, 07:20 PM posted to sci.space.station
David Spain
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,901
Default Ammonia Pump Forensics?

Jorge R. Frank wrote:
On 09/11/2010 05:15 PM, David Spain wrote:
Jorge R. Frank wrote:
Will not happen on 134 (AMS flight). Will happen on 135 if 135 is
approved and funded.


Jorge,

How many shuttle flights could be approved after 134? I thought the
limiting factor was the fact that Michaud has been shut down and there
are only a limited number of ETs available?


STS-134 and 335 [135?] are planned to be stacked with ET-138 and 122. It is
probable that if 135 is approved that the ETs will be swapped and 122
will fly on 134, since 122 is the "Katrina tank" and NASA doesn't want
to fly that one on a flight that doesn't have a LON rescue flight after it.

Geez, cutting it close aren't we? STS-134 is scheduled for Feb 26. When is the
commit date to pick an ET?

There are no other completed SLWTs. There is one LWT that can be
refurbished (ET-94) and enough piece parts to assemble a few more SLWTs
(ET-139 through 141, IIRC).


So if I did my math correctly [always a problem ;-)] there are two ETs
available, but one only for use if there is no LON (Launch On Need?) backup.
Enough piece parts to assemble 3 more and a possible one can be refurbished.
That's a total of six more if we play our cards right. And ttttthat's all folks.

Hmm, how close does that get us to a manned Dragon if we drag that out to one
(shuttle) per year? Can we bridge the gap?

Dave