View Single Post
  #34  
Old August 28th 10, 04:05 AM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.physics,sci.astro
Androcles[_33_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 369
Default EINSTEINIANA, PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, HONESTY


"Peter Webb" wrote in message
...
|
| "Androcles" wrote in message
| news:v3Odo.114623$NG7.80458@hurricane...
|
| "Peter Webb" wrote in message
| ...
| | My question (which you snipped, again):
| |
| | "Are there any experimental predictions of Relativity with which
| | you disagree, or do you believe all its experimental predictions to be
| | correct?"
| |
| |
| | The time Cassini reports differs from the time SR predicts it would
| | report.
| | Ok, now pretend I haven't answered you, you stupid ****.
| |
| |
| | So you are saying that don't agree with experimental predictions of
| | Relativity regarding the frequency shift of its microwave
transmissions
| due
| | to gravity?
|
| I am saying
| The time Cassini reports differs from the time SR predicts it would
| report. Now pretend I haven't answered you, you stupid ****.
|
| The time Cassini reports does not differ from the time predicted by
| Relativity, as a million websites confirm.
|
| So I guess you are just making things up?

You are not only a fool for guessing, you are a ****ing liar too.

|
| Are there any experimental predictions of Relativity that you disagree
with?
| Or do you think that all its experimental predictions are correct?


http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/s...es/saturntime/
"The first signal arrived at Earth one hour and 14 minutes later at 01:30
Ground UTC on Oct. 27."

Relativity predicts:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
"the velocity of light in our theory plays the part, physically, of an
infinitely great velocity" --§ 4. Physical Meaning of the Equations
Obtained in Respect to Moving Rigid Bodies and Moving Clocks
-- ON THE ELECTRODYNAMICS OF MOVING BODIES By A. Einstein

"It seems that Light is propagated in time, spending in its passage from
the sun to us about seven Minutes of time:" -- DEFIN. II of Opticks Or,
A Treatise of the Reflections, Refractions, Inflections and Colours of
Light - Sir Isaac Newton.

Newton was a little bit off in his accuracy, he relied on Ole Roemer's
evaluation of light's speed and that poor guy had a wrong estimate for
Jupiter's distance.


Are you playing the part, physically, of being ****in' insane?
Or do you guess you are raving mad?
Hint: It was a rhetorical question, I don't need to guess.

Case closed.