On Aug 18, 7:07*pm, American wrote:
On Aug 18, 6:00*pm, Saul Levy wrote:



Toilets are FOR ****!

More yours than mine.

Saul Levy

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:19:29 -0700 (PDT), American

wrote:
On Aug 18, 4:55*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
I did it for you.

This data should NOT BE POSTED HERE. *The original source should be
given and anyone interested can look there.

You're as bad as ED DUMBER THAN ELEPHANT ****.

Saul Levy

On Wed, 18 Aug 2010 10:27:28 -0700 (PDT), American

wrote:
On Aug 18, 1:11*pm, Saul Levy wrote:
Could you CUT THIS **** DOWN next time?

Saul Levy
That only works in your perfect world of automatic conjecture,
which in your case, doesn't ever achieve the desired result of
personal satisfaction, albeit I am quite entertained by your
relentless disconnect with the real issues of the day being
just ELEPHANT s**t.

Go resize your toilet - I think your brains just fell inside...

he he he

A new, clean bowl with fresh water in it makes a fine
Saul-skull, as far as I'm concerned!!!

No, Usenet is not a toilet - it's just the rhetoricizers like
Saul-skulls that make it all the more hilarious!!!

STOP CLOUDING THE TOILETBOWL!!!

I purposefully posted the data to point out the absurdity
by being absurd - it's called "the theatre of the absurd",
so please don't dissent towards your own newsgroup!!!

(Maybe you should try looking elsewhere for your own
"jollies" and starting another newsgroup, e.g. alt.puff.waterpipes
or alt.society.lobotomy

he he he he... * * ...get over it....

American

"He has to part his hair with an axe"

I have created a link to an asteroid mining page he

http://home.comcast.net/~samuel_ransom/mining.htm

This represents a general treatment of asteroids, with regard to
minerology and spectral reflectivity, emissivity, etc., and was
written at a time that these values were easily available in
the national online databases.

Today it would seem that the data is a bit cryptic, as I'm not
sure that there is any one program where the values given for
the different filters and settings could automatically output a
given transmissibility, or even reflectivity.

The focus of my interest is on the NEA metallic asteroids,
and I will offer to exchange some important information about
SAR mapping if someone could offer me how to interpret the
data given for the NEO's in the Whitely catalog, as previously
mentioned. The link for the Whitely catalog is:

http://starbrite.jpl.nasa.gov/pds/vi...ELEY-PHOT-V1.0

Thanks,

American

"A genius can do almost anything except make a living."