View Single Post
  #10  
Old August 3rd 10, 09:43 PM posted to sci.space.shuttle,sci.space.policy
bob haller safety advocate
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 615
Default shuttle replacement

On Aug 3, 1:51*pm, Pat Flannery wrote:
On 8/3/2010 5:56 AM, Joseph Nebus wrote:

* *As I recall there was some thinking in early development of the
Shuttle that White Sands, New Mexico, would be a rather good launch site
allowing for convenient equatorial and polar orbits and also being a
nifty landing site right away. *But there was no hope of selling a whole
brand-new launch complex when NASA had barely got done painting the
Vehicle Assembly Building, so, that idea died swiftly.


* *(And it would turn out to be not so good as a landing site
anyway.)


That would have worked for the Faget concept with the winged booster,
but the chosen design had those two SRBs to recover, and water was a lot
softer than sand to touch them down on. ;-)

Pat


loaded bombs should never overfly populated areas at all because
accidents can occur.....

KSC is a excellent facility and should remain the countries space port