Big Bang
On Jul 16, 9:17*am, gb wrote:
Was the "Big Bang" an explosive event, similar to a thermonuclear
bomb, or was it a matter of unrolling the three dimensions we now
perceive as identifying our space?
Unrolling the dimensions, from a perspective within this universe, may
have been a smooth, gentle process that would not have produced the
inferno that most Big Bang ideas are built around.
Gordon
I think the universe is a quantum energy pulsating quark repeating the
big bang.
That means there are small universes making up a bigger universe, and
even in the bigger universe the speed of light remains the same,
meaning
that universe is just like ours, only things go much slower there in
terms
of time. But I am not a fan believing Einstein's relativity theory is
correct
which supports this idea. Quantum universes.
Based on Einstein's theory I think it is the
distortion of time that causes the big bang.
The universe cools as it expands, and eventually
reaches zero kelvin where even light comes to a
full stop. Once that happens, distortion in time
begins occurring which brings the universe to a
singularity explosion, which would be the big bang,
a time distortion.
But bringing it down to quantum nuclear physics,
we find the pulsating energy that is like a quark's
tiny big bangs occurring periodically billions of
times a second.
|