On Apr 15, 1:40*am, Sam Wormley wrote:
On 4/14/10 12:16 PM, oriel36 wrote:

Being in a position to prove rotation once in 24 hours using cause and
effect only allows me to offer people a second chance to revisit the
great astronomical insights using the tools of modern imaging *and all
those modifications and adaptations which are waiting for those who
can rise to a level of understanding of planetary dynamics whether it
is climate,geology,solar system structure,influence of the solar
system's galactic orbital motion on orbital dynamics and many,many
other things.

* *What you wrote is just word salad, Gerald!

* *Direct observation shows you are wrong about the 24 hours.

There is no right or wrong as to why twilight lengths vary with
latitude,the slower rotational speeds away from the equator correlate
with longer twilights where the maximum equatorial speed is 1037.5
miles per hour and turning an entire 24,901 mile circumference in 24
hours.This is the only proof people will need to recover astronomy
and in doing so ,recover their own humanity,to act as a servant to
humanity instead of a slave to a cult tyranny.

The proof is nothing more than a way to open up the windows on
planetary dynamics,for instance,the current volcanic activity in
Iceland is linked to the underlying Mid Atlantic Ridge which shows all
the traits of being influenced by the internal rotational
mechanism.Astronomers could have pointed out the lack of tectonic
activity on Venus apart from volcanism by correlating the rotational
characteristics of each planet, their spherical deviation and numerous
ways to extract clues as to the internal characteristics.The
conceptual gridlock surfaces in geology by assigning no rotational
mechanism between viscous interior and fractured crust and that makes
it an astronomical problem or rather,the inability to even discuss
rotational speeds generates no conceptual spark needed to get cause
and effect up and running.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/travel/tr...-forecast.html

I have earned the right to express dismay at what the large
institutions are doing or not doing but ultimately it is the people
who frequent this forum who should be ashamed of themselves for not
recognizing the simple and effective proof for rotation once in 24
hours thereby moving things forward to productive topics.



..






And of
* *course galactic orbital motion has nothing to do with the planetary
* *dynamics of our solar system. Newton work out the basics and planetary
* *and celestial mechanics quickly followed.