Pat Flannery wrote:
On 3/18/2010 2:29 PM, LSMFT wrote:
Pat Flannery wrote:
At least that's what I make of the guy on the right in the photo with
this story:
http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2010...an/#more-23289



That's what our government needs for its news conferences - more
dancers. ;-)

Russia will be starting Iran's nuke generator soon. The US is having a
hissy fit.


There's one thing I don't get here.
Iran says it needs reactors because it lacks the ability to generate
sufficient electricity for its own needs.
Although he country is swimming in oil, it doesn't have the capability
to refine that oil into petroleum products with which it could run
powerplants.
So instead of building reactors, why isn't Iran building petroleum
refineries?
That would reduce people's fears, remove Iran's reliance on others to
refine their crude oil, and since they could now export finished
petroleum products as well as crude oil and have plenty of petroleum
products to use for internal needs at lower cost, make the whole country
more profitable.

Pat

Crude pollutes. They want to reduce C02. And why not?

--
LSMFT

Drive slower than the posted speed.............................
And you too can become a fracking prick..............