the constant is the speed in vacuum, only, but
vacuum is strictly relative (to the refractive index),
as *almost* dyscovered by Pascal.

http://sampit.geol.sc.edu/Doppler.html
If you could find such a "jellyfish" for light; an object that is

thus:
it seems that all of Russell's paradoxes were illinguistic,
not properly tensed. no barber cuts his own hair e.g.;
he'd go to the next village.

thus:
if you cannot take the heat re M&M,
get out of the frying pan:
http://21stcenturysciencetech.com/sample.html

thus:
re "spheres of nanothermite,"
do either of you know the primary use of thermite, and
what it is made of?

thus:
I respect his right to wait til "P3" is out, but
a precis would be appreciated.

and, please, don't just *say* that Michelson, Morley et al go "no"
results,
because they actually got some (small) seasonal anomalies --
that goes for you, two, Uncle Al!

Experimental constraints on Special Relativity

--Light: A History!
http://wlym.com