View Single Post
  #4  
Old February 18th 10, 01:42 PM posted to sci.astro
Yousuf Khan[_2_]
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 1,692
Default Big Bang - Explosive or dimensional uncurling?

dlzc wrote:
Dear Antares 531:

On Feb 14, 3:48 pm, Antares 531 wrote:
What's the most widely accepted position on this. Was the Big Bang a
humongous explosion, or was it a matter of three spatial dimensions
uncurling? If this was an explosion, what did things expand into? Were
the three spatial dimensions we now perceive always there, but
completely devoid of any matter other than the point at which the Big
Bang occurred?


"OG" has the right of it.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm

David A. Smith


This quote is new to me:

Big Bang Nucleosynthesis
"Most lithium and beryllium is produced by cosmic ray collisions
breaking up some of the carbon produced in stars."
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/BBNS.html

I thought most Lithium was produced in the Big Bang? And that all of the
Lithium we have now is all that we'll ever have.

Yousuf Khan