The last tactics of a dying hypothesis
"John Maxson" wrote in message
I don't believe that you are capable (even with help from Jorge,
Roger, Daniel, and Henry) of sitting down with paper and pencil,
drawing out top, side, and end (frontal) views for the path you
claim the 51-L boosters took through the fireball (ie., the right
SRB swinging out at the bottom and nosing into the LOX tank,
That's not what I claim.
exiting as shown by the totality of NASA's photos), and then
placing those three engineering drawings on the web to prove
your point (that there was no 'before vs. after' transposition of
the 51-L boosters. Put them up or shut up; that's how I see it.
He can ask it, but he can't do it himself.
JTM
Furthermore, JTM, I will respond to direct technical questions from others,
but I won't expend my valuable time to chase your every diversion. The
burden of proof has always been on you, and you have failed to meet the
challenge at every step of the way. You've displayed a lack of knowledge of
the kinematics and dynamics of flight, a lack of knowledge of shuttle flight
dynamics, a total lack of being man enough to admit when you were wrong, and
so on. It would be a total waste of my time to recreate what you refused to
look at the first time I posted it. Besides, it's not necessary; as it turns
out, at least the PC Report has got that part of the investigation nailed.
You need to look squarely in the eyes of the reflection in the mirror and
ask yourself what is important, get a grip on reality, and pursue that
before it's too late.
Jon
|