In article , jacob navia
writes:

And the authors of the paper say they will see galaxies at redshift
10, even much farther away.

The quantity of interest here is the time between various redshifts, not
some measure of distance.

Now is evident that the 13.7 Giga years is a ridiculous low number,

Rather than saying "a galaxy can't form in 500 million years" (which, to
carry on you analogy, sounds like "humans couldn't evolve from
monkey-like ancestors"---just a statement with no proof), do you have
any reference to a paper which demonstrates that there is NO WAY that a
galaxy could form in the time available, rather than that it is just
"difficult" within a scenario which is not completely understood anyway?