View Single Post
  #7  
Old November 21st 09, 09:04 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
BURT
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 371
Default How much more proof does one need?

On Nov 21, 12:42*pm, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 10:39:14 -0000, "Androcles"
wrote:







"Henry Wilson DSc ." HW@.. wrote in message
.. .
On Sat, 21 Nov 2009 08:53:57 GMT, HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:
Sorry, here's the website:
www.scisite.info/RCru2.jpg


Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm


* * * Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..


There you are, you old bugger. When you didn't show for a
couple of days I was getting worried about ya.
If you want to space in a URL you need "%20", like this:
*www.scisite.info/R%20Cru2.jpg


OK Try this:http://www.scisite.info/r_cru.jpg

Pretty convincing, eh?

Note, 'velocity' is true radial velocity towards Earth. It includes pitch.. I
haven't bothered to set either distance or velocity at any measured value
because I cannot find reliable figures. Hipparcos and Tycho give different
values for parallax. 1.9 and 3.1 mas respectively. However, the product
(distance x velocity) is the important factor. Reducing one by a particular
factor and increasing the other by the same amount produces the same curve, as
you should know.

Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

* * * *Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -


The speed of light is a constant until inside the atom.

Mitch Raemsch