View Single Post
  #5  
Old November 21st 09, 05:22 PM posted to sci.physics.relativity,sci.astro
eric gisse
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 342
Default How much more proof does one need?

HW@..(Henry Wilson DSc). wrote:

Einstein's second postulate is clearly wrong.

Here is another typical 'cepheid' brightness curve, easily matched with a
BaTh simulation.

The apparent brightness variation is caused by changes in the emitted
light's speed towards Earth as the star orbits it barycentre with a large
planet.


Cephids aren't planetary systems.


Just about ALL 'cepheid' curves can be explained in this way. 'Cepheids'
are not pulsating stars at all. When are astronomers going to wake up and
stop making complete fools of themselves.


Around the time you post under your real name.



Henry Wilson...www.scisite.info/index.htm

Einstein...World's greatest SciFi writer..