On 8 Oct, 22:40, oriel36 wrote:
On Oct 8, 10:13*pm, Mike Collins
wrote:





On 8 Oct, 21:21, oriel36 wrote:
(snip)

decades ?,somehow Galileo expressed this awful condition that is now
worse than ever -

"The same thing has struck me even more forcibly than you. I have
heard such things put forth as I should blush to repeat--not so much
to avoid discrediting their authors (whose names could always be
withheld) as to refrain from detracting so greatly from the honor of
the human race. In the long run my observations have convinced me that
some men, reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion In
their minds which, either because of its being their own or because of
their having received it from some person who has their entire
confidence, impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever
to get it out of their heads. Such arguments in support of their fixed
idea as they hit upon themselves or hear set forth by others, no
matter how simple and stupid these may be, gain their instant
acceptance and applause. On the other hand whatever is brought forward
against it, however ingenious and conclusive, they receive with
disdain or with hot rage--if indeed it does not make them ill "
Galileo

Who do you think Galileo was referring to here.

"Some men, reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion
In
their minds which, either because of its being their own or because of
their having received it from some person who has their entire
confidence, impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever
to get it out of their heads."

He is describing people like you who only consider their own
subjective views of the universe and ignore any evidence they don't
like instead of examining all the evidence critically and
dispassionately.

I have the time lapse footage from Hubble showing with a 100%
certainty that an additional orbital specific is required to explain
seasonal temperature fluctuations at different latitudes and whatever
you freaks think ,it is a technical certainty that the role of 'tilt'
for any given planet is based on equatorial or polar conditions and
Not the cause of the seasons -

http://hubblesite.org/newscenter/arc...999/11/video/b

You stupid creatures cannot even interpret a simple orbital signature
and I have been forced to use childish analogies to explain all this
before.

*Galileo was a scientist. He also enjoyed using a

telescope to look at the night sky. If you met him now you would
dismiss him as an astrologer and empiricist. He, of course would
consider you to be a crank.

Galileo understood the insight of Copernicus and especially
retrogrades while you as an empiricist drone do not -

" For to the earth planetary motions appear sometimes direct,
sometimes stationary, nay, and sometimes retrograde . But from the sun
they are always seen direct," Newton

Even when modern imaging allows anyone with a shred of intelligence
and common sense to determine that the resolution ,based on the
Earth's planetary orbital *dynamic, resolves retrogrades,you still
can't anything wrong with that *empirical numbskull -

http://antwrp.gsfc.nasa.gov/apod/ima...2000_tezel.gif

Whatever you consider yourselves to be,right at this moment you are
dullards who have become dangerous with these stupid conclusions based
on carbon dioxide and global temperatures to the point that climate
change is not the problem,the decay of human intelligence is.

Are the images from Hubble not spectacular enough for you that you
can't figure out what is going on orbitally with Uranus in order to
make comparisons with the dynamics behind the Earth's global climate
and seasonal hemispherical changes in temperature ?.People who can't
explain the seasons properly should not,should not be dictating
conclusions for temperature spikes.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

The images from Hubble, placed in orbit using Newtonian physics, are
always spectacular. What is less spectacular is your deliberate folly
in refusing to accept this because you are on of those people who
"reasoning preposterously, first establish some conclusion In their
minds which, either because of its being their own or because of their
having received it from some person who has their entire confidence,
impresses them so deeply that one finds it impossible ever to get it
out of their heads."


And how dare you call me a drone. I work for a living while you seem
to spend all your time trying to get even one convert to your cult.