Come to eat supper tonight and this NOVA show was
on, "Monster of the Milky Way" about black-holes.

It had been on several times in years past but I turned
it off because, I do not believe any black holes exist
and that imagination has just run amok over this topic.

I cringe at all the statements as if black holes are foregone
conclusions. And that these black-hole theorists can hog the center
stage with their theory.
And hog so that alternative theories that cast huge doubt are never
invited to speak out.

For instance the recent MECO theory by several astronomers proves no
black-holes in that galaxy and that the MECO emits a conical north and
south polar
vortices the same as what black-holes are conjectured to emit.

But all in all, I watched the program even though it was hard going
and alot of cringing.

But let me point out how weak their argument is. How
awfully weak and that they never deserved a hour long
NOVA show. Usually these type of shows have at least a 40% or 30% of
scientist who cast doubt on what the topic is but in this NOVA it was
pure 100% time on those convinced and what I would call deluded black
hole theorists.

But let me mention the tiny shred of evidence that holds that program
together. It was mentioned that if there are stars in a region where
it is suspected a black-hole that the star would accelerate in its
orbit and be hugely deflected. So they looked in the Sagittarus region
of the Milky Way and they found with their adaptive imaging that it
looked as though there was a body near Sagittarus that had this huge
deflection.

And from that shred of evidence we have a huge group of so called
scientists ( I call them science-fictionalists) dominating the
astronomy with their black
hole theory.

You see, if someone were to have been placed on that
PBS NOVA program to counter that claim would have
simply said. Look, take any region of the Milky Way
where there are a dense population of stars and you will easily find
the same sort of accelerated deflection
and where it is ludicrous to think there is a black-hole
nearby.

So in otherwords, the meager shred of evidence of
acceleration of stars near Sagitarus is nothing special.
That the astronomy community fell into a huge logic-hole (sorry for
the pun). A logic hole that they were looking for accelerated star
near Sagitarus, but then,
looking near any other place in the cosmos will get the
very same sought for accelerated star. So that logic
cannot give those scientists in that program evidence
of a black-hole, nor that an accelerated star is just as
likely to happen near a MECO.

And coupled with the fact that MECO theory has bold
evidence that black-holes cannot exist and that if you see a bipolar
funnel near a star does not mean it is a
black-hole but rather it could be a MECO.

So in this entire NOVA show on black-holes is a modern day science
propaganda and not a science
good program.

This used to bother me alot. But I realize that in science, usually
the first theories proffered to explain something are usually wrong
theories and that the
correct and true theories have to take time to oust and
remove the fiction theory. Black-holes are a fiction theory but it is
okay that they hog the limelight, because in the future, those so
called scientists will be laughed at, not congratulated.

So we need deluded people to stretch their necks out
on preposterous theories like black-holes, whilst the real scientists
with MECO slowly and gradually trashcann the delusionists. And it is
okay that the MECO theorists get no attention, get no respect, and
lie low for years while the delusionists hog away. It is okay, because
in the future, it is the delusionists that
be studied for "what not to do to be a scientist"

Now I am rather stuck here in this book since the six
chapters have been all blended together and I was
hoping to have this 3rd edition all organized. But it looks as though
the next edition is going to have to
straighten out the chapters.

So what I am going to do is cut and paste much of the
2nd edition to fill in the rest of this 3rd edition and then
call it quits for another year until I pick up and write the 4th
edition.

This 3rd edition was really about elaborating on MECO
theory anyway and that was accomplished.
But I would expect and like for this book to run about
700 pages to 1000 pages. And that is not going to be
reached in this edition.

So from here on out to the end, it is mostly cut and paste from the
2nd edition. And then by the 4th edition
when I get the incentive to write the 4th edition, that I can have
complete order and organization that I can
detail every chapter so that it does reach 700 to 1000
pages.

Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies