On Jun 22, 10:24*pm, "Curtis Croulet"
wrote:
Pick any Solstice...etc., etc., ad nauseum.

Did you even look at Anthony's image? *Did you read his accompanying
comments? *Have you bothered to investigate what a Palomar globular is?
Both of your posts (so far) in this thread have been utterly unrelated to
the topic.

BTW, in your earlier post you used "who's" (a contraction of "who is") when
you apparently meant "whose." *Apparently grammar isn't your strong suit,
either. *That's aside from reading comprehension.
--
Curtis Croulet
Temecula, California

The so-called planet 'debate' ended with the belief that people will
eventually get accustomed to 8 planets just as they believe that they
will become accustomed to the term ' global climate change' instead of
what it actually is - pollution. Many people suspect that the grounds
for dumping a global temperature spike on humanity is at best weak
while I know just how reckless that conclusion actually is,and how it
generates a conceptual rut that may be impossible to get out of.

This social tyranny of correlating global temperatures directly with
carbon dioxide levels is toxic from any point of view,but in this
insane world dominated by scientists who can't get basic astronomical
facts for shape and rotation straight,the wider population out of
laziness is swallowing the hyper-fuss.

You are children playing around with magnification equipment and
calling yourselves astronomers but I have yet to meet another one who
can come close to a conversation.