On May 9, 10:20*pm, "Max Keon" wrote:
dlzc wrote:
Dear Skeu:
Skeu wrote:
Annihilation of positron and electron is a clear example
of the deep distance between empiric evidence and the
theory about those evidence.

Actually no. *Such interactions are well understood and expected.
Anti-matter is by definition capable of real distruction

Funny, in an anti-matter Universe, they'd be saying the same
thing about *you*!
if it would be combined with matter. So how is it
possible from this combination the creation of something
as powerful as the Gamma ray.

Because it is symmetric. *A powerful gamma ray can spawn the
creation of matter-antimatter pairs. *Do a search for "pair
creation".

Many theories are based on idiotic assumptions that are falsified
immediately by the shear stupidity of the assumptions. Isn't it
blatantly obvious that a gamma ray has no mechanism with which
to make an electron or positron? How can it possibly know what
an electron or positron is? Does it carry some kind of code built
into the frequency that can be physically extracted in stages as
the pair slowly become aware of their existence? How can a dumb
ray be so amazingly clever? And why only electrons and positrons?
Why not the opposite sides of my jam sandwich? The gamma ray
would need to carry some kind of jam sandwich gene for that to
happen, of course.

And why does the creation process stop when the charge on each
has reached the required value even if the ray carries much more
energy than the combined value of the two? I can postulate you
a reason why that is so of course. The creation process is
entirely controlled by the emerging electron and positron as they
become self aware because they are, without doubt, fundamental
forces of nature and the parameters for their development are
set by the laws of nature. They will always end up being exactly
the same as any other electron or positron in the universe. But
I wouldn't be game to tell anyone that because I know I would be
laughed off the planet, even if I had a huge pile of math to
back it up.

The problem of modern physics is the gap between
experimental data and theory suitable to explain it.

No, the problem is, that newsgroups don't have any sort of
entrance examination. *So that anybody that knows how to type can
make claims based on their own ignorance. *And can never be
challenged / expected to learn.

You probably don't perceive that paragraph as I do.

-----

Max Keon

How many Cooper pairs of electrons or positrons might coexist within
the IGM per cubic second (2.7e25 m3)?

~ BG