View Single Post
  #4  
Old July 29th 03, 02:35 PM
Tony Flanders
external usenet poster
 
Posts: n/a
Default W. Ferris article in Sky and Telescope August 2003 article on ODM

(PrisNo6) wrote in message . com...

To summarize -
Backgrd
brightns Limiting magnitude
Ba Knoll/Schaefer Blackwell/Clark

18.4 4.30
19 4.77 5.80
20 5.49 5.81
21 6.12 6.56
22 6.62 7.17


...

Charming, isn't it, how wildly the experts vary? Let's say that
the dream sky, which can be approached but never equalled on Earth,
is mag 22 per square arcsecond. Knoll/Schaefer places the NELM
for that sky at 6.6, Blackwell/Clark at 7.2, and Ferris at 8.0.
FWIW, under my customary decent rural skies -- surely no better
than mag 21 per square arcsecond, if that -- I have seen stars
to mag 6.8 or 6.9, but I have done no better at all under far
darker and clearer skies out West.

And estimates of NELM under heavy light pollution vary even more,
if possible, although I suspect for somewhat different reasons.

Oh how I long for a cheap, widely available device to give an
objective measure of sky brightness! As things stand, we are
like the people building the tower of Babel, all talking at
cross-purposes to each other.

- Tony Flannders