...He really needs to give a tutorial on how to do those coin effects.


Thanks for the compliments! Again, the graphic is HIGHLY speculative,
and entirely too reductive. Unfortunately, my positionality is not
explicit in the illustration (and probably unclear elsewhere). The
audience is thankfully not anyone from NASA, a space historians, or
physicists...because I'd definitely get a verbal roasting, or at least
a good laugh. Rather, the graphic is in the an architectural meme of
taking highly reductive concepts from outside the field, adding the
spice of speculation, and running with it. My degree project critics,
panelists, and advisers know well that I am no rocket scientist, nor
are they. They understand this line of thinking, therefore I am not
be disingenuous or stupid.

The internet is problematic, as demonstrated he no framework is
given for the graphic...it would be bad if some kid cut and pasted it
into a report or something, yeah? ;^)

-Andrew Liebchen.