|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarifcation by
Jonathan McDowell
Bill - good idea, but shouldn't the last sentence be:
Note that the
reference point may lie outside the image and that the
CENTER OF THE first...
|
|
0 |
1,570 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarifcation by
Mark Calabretta
On Tue 2008/05/27 14:42:55 -0400, Jonathan McDowell wrote
in a message to:
Dear Jonathan,
- since we have talked above about floating...
|
|
0 |
1,516 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Jonathan McDowell
Mark,
I was a bit unclear earlier, sorry. I shouldn't try and
reply to email while on vacation!
However, I think the statement that I was making is nothing...
|
|
0 |
1,660 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Eric Greisen
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
However, I think the statement that I was making is nothing to do with
your very valid concerns. My point is that we have...
|
|
0 |
1,625 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Jonathan McDowell
Eric, I didn't mean that the other approach was being done in FITS,
I know it was done in some non-FITS astronomy data packages (if I remember
correctly, the...
|
|
0 |
1,653 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Thu 2008/05/29 08:45:21 CST, Eric Greisen wrote
in a message to: Jonathan McDowell
and copied to:
Dear...
|
|
0 |
1,758 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Fri 2008/05/30 12:48:46 +1000, Mark Calabretta wrote
in a message to: Jonathan McDowell ,
Eric Greisen...
|
|
0 |
1,848 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Steve Allen
On Fri 2008-05-30T12:48:46 +1000, Mark Calabretta hath writ:
I don't think that we have any significant points of disagreement.
I concur.
We also do not...
|
|
0 |
1,586 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Steve Allen wrote:
We also do not have a set of altered words for Bill Pence to propose
which make it clear that traverse along array indices isn't...
|
|
0 |
1,669 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Make that "astrometry.net", of course.
On May 30, 2008, at 12:48 AM, Rob Seaman wrote:
Steve Allen wrote:
We also do not have a set of altered words...
|
|
0 |
1,736 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Maren Purves
Rob Seaman wrote:
This discussion reminds me of the innumerable "which way is up?"
questions in the IRAF mail over the years. The answer goes something...
|
|
0 |
1,742 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,601 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
William Pence[_2_]
In order to bring this discussion to a conclusion and finalize the new
FITS Standard document, I suggest 2 small modifications to the previous
proposal to...
|
|
0 |
1,565 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,397 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: FITSBITS
1. Change the first sentence in section 8.1 from
...
|
|
0 |
1,474 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Eric Greisen
Mark Calabretta wrote:
On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: FITSBITS
1. Change the first...
|
|
0 |
1,490 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Perhaps simply excise "(e.g. as is done for random groups data)"? The
less said about random groups, the better :-)
Rob
--
On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:20 AM,...
|
|
0 |
1,411 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
William Pence[_2_]
Taking Rob's suggestion, the proposed changes to the new draft FITS
Standard are as follows:
1) Insert the following paragraph at the start of Sect. 8.1:
...
|
|
0 |
1,296 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2008/06/16 08:20:03 CST, Eric Greisen wrote
in a message to: Mark Calabretta
and copied to: William Pence...
|
|
0 |
1,308 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2008/06/16 07:37:27 MST, Rob Seaman wrote
in a message to: Eric Greisen , Mark Calabretta mcalabre@at
nf.csiro.au
and copied...
|
|
0 |
1,320 |