|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Eric Greisen
Mark Calabretta wrote:
On Thu 2008/06/12 14:13:44 -0400, William Pence wrote
in a message to: FITSBITS
1. Change the first...
|
|
0 |
1,490 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2008/06/16 07:37:27 MST, Rob Seaman wrote
in a message to: Eric Greisen , Mark Calabretta mcalabre@at
nf.csiro.au
and copied...
|
|
0 |
1,320 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2008/06/16 08:20:03 CST, Eric Greisen wrote
in a message to: Mark Calabretta
and copied to: William Pence...
|
|
0 |
1,308 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
William Pence[_2_]
Taking Rob's suggestion, the proposed changes to the new draft FITS
Standard are as follows:
1) Insert the following paragraph at the start of Sect. 8.1:
...
|
|
0 |
1,296 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Perhaps simply excise "(e.g. as is done for random groups data)"? The
less said about random groups, the better :-)
Rob
--
On Jun 16, 2008, at 7:20 AM,...
|
|
0 |
1,411 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2008/06/16 17:36:27 MST, Rob Seaman wrote
in a message to: Mark Calabretta
and copied to: Eric Greisen ,...
|
|
0 |
1,511 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,397 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Maren Purves
Rob Seaman wrote:
This discussion reminds me of the innumerable "which way is up?"
questions in the IRAF mail over the years. The answer goes something...
|
|
0 |
1,742 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Make that "astrometry.net", of course.
On May 30, 2008, at 12:48 AM, Rob Seaman wrote:
Steve Allen wrote:
We also do not have a set of altered words...
|
|
0 |
1,736 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
Steve Allen wrote:
We also do not have a set of altered words for Bill Pence to propose
which make it clear that traverse along array indices isn't...
|
|
0 |
1,669 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Fri 2008/05/30 12:48:46 +1000, Mark Calabretta wrote
in a message to: Jonathan McDowell ,
Eric Greisen...
|
|
0 |
1,848 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Mark Calabretta
On Thu 2008/05/29 08:45:21 CST, Eric Greisen wrote
in a message to: Jonathan McDowell
and copied to:
Dear...
|
|
0 |
1,758 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Eric Greisen
Jonathan McDowell wrote:
However, I think the statement that I was making is nothing to do with
your very valid concerns. My point is that we have...
|
|
0 |
1,625 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Jonathan McDowell
Mark,
I was a bit unclear earlier, sorry. I shouldn't try and
reply to email while on vacation!
However, I think the statement that I was making is nothing...
|
|
0 |
1,660 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Steve Allen
On Mon 2008-06-16T16:52:34 -0400, William Pence hath writ:
If anyone objects to the use of the phrase "regular lattice
structure" in that first sentence...
|
|
0 |
1,431 |
|
|
[fitsbits] CRPIX clarification by
Rob Seaman
To clarify that, the statement could be changed to "(e.g. as is done
for the random parameters using PTYPEn in random groups data)". The
whole point is...
|
|
0 |
1,377 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Definition of "deprecated" by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2007/08/27 10:19:32 MST, "Dick Shaw" wrote
in a message to:
"This term is used to refer to obsolete structures that _should...
|
|
0 |
1,560 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Definition of "deprecated" by
William Pence
As I recall, the definition of "deprecate" was carefully crafted to
satisfy the radio interferometry community. The reason for deprecating
random groups was...
|
|
0 |
1,358 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Draft WCS Paper V: Time by
Rob Seaman
Howdy,
On Apr 2, 2009, at 2:57 PM, Arnold Rots wrote:
FITS WCS Paper V: Time
======================
Draft is available for comment
...
|
|
0 |
1,505 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Draft WCS Paper V: Time by
Robert Hanisch
I like the reference to Gregorius, 1582. The VOEvent standard
references Tycho, 1573.
I looked up the reference to Gregorius (1582). You can find it, in...
|
|
0 |
1,530 |