|
|
|
|
0 |
1,362 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,957 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Definition of "deprecated" by
William Pence
As I recall, the definition of "deprecate" was carefully crafted to
satisfy the radio interferometry community. The reason for deprecating
random groups was...
|
|
0 |
1,501 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,851 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Definition of "deprecated" by
Mark Calabretta
On Mon 2007/08/27 10:19:32 MST, "Dick Shaw" wrote
in a message to:
"This term is used to refer to obsolete structures that _should...
|
|
0 |
1,724 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,861 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Definition of "deprecated" by
Dick Shaw
Looking at the current vs. proposed definitions of what it means to say that a
structure is "deprecated" in FITS, and considering some of the discussion on...
|
|
0 |
1,563 |
|
|
|
|
59 |
7,199 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword by
Arnold Rots
And so:
The inescapable conclusion appears to be that EXTEND and NEXTEND are
keywords that have outlived their usefulness, should be deprecated and
ignored...
|
|
0 |
1,690 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword by
Preben Grosbol
On Friday 24 August 2007 14:12, Randall Thompson wrote:
If the consensus is that
there should not be any connection between the primary header and
...
|
|
0 |
1,567 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword by
Randall Thompson
I understand this point however you can not prevent users
from adding their own (conforming) keywords If the consensus is that
there should not be any...
|
|
0 |
1,598 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword by
Preben Grosbol
On Thursday 23 August 2007 23:15, Randall Thompson wrote:
Although not a
reserved keyword, NEXTEND is commonly used to describe the
number of included...
|
|
0 |
1,619 |
|
|
[fitsbits] Abuse of EXTEND keyword by
Preben Grosbol
On Thursday 23 August 2007 03:25, Tim Pearson wrote:
My guess (it's a long time ago) is that there were FITS files out *
there that had special records...
|
|
1 |
1,676 |
|
|
[fitsbits] once FITS always FITS by
Preben Grosbol
On Tuesday 21 August 2007 19:10, Steve Allen wrote:
A question for those who have been around longer than I:
Does "once FITS always FITS" mean
I'm may...
|
|
0 |
1,672 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,541 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,600 |
|
|
|
|
3 |
1,860 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,579 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,471 |
|
|
|
|
0 |
1,882 |