Re: Space Camp info

[cndc]

Joe writes:

> I'm getting tired of this rot (which, in case there is somebody
> living in a cave who hasn't caught on yet, is NOT from Alan but from
> some other immature coward forging his name). Which of the above
> headers would you suggest would be most effective at filtering out
> garbage from this idiot, without affecting legitimate postings?

^Organization: .*LE Mail2News

would probably work.

Elizabeth

[OM]

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:50:33 +1000, "Alan Erskine"
> wrote:

>Thanks, Joe. Richard Katz or OM are the most likely scum doing this.

....You know, up until now you were the victim here. I've defended you,
and pointed out who the true suspects were in this. And now you go and
put the blame on *ME*?

[Counts to ten, but gets as far as seven]

No. **** that. And **** you, Alan. And the horse you rode in on.

....I made a major mistake where you were concerned, Alan. At the
advice of someone I considered a friend with a rational outlook on
things, I took you out of my killfile. The truth is obvious - I should
have never let you out of Killfile Hell, and should have left you
there to rot.

....Well, that's a problem easily fixed. All I need to do is send you
back to Killfile Hell to become John Maxson's bunkmate. And that's
where you're going as of right now, especially since it'll get rid of
you *and* your impostor.

<PLONK>

....Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice. you'd better ****ing
duck and cover.


OM

--

"No ******* ever won a war by dying for | http://www.io.com/~o_m
his country. He won it by making the other | Sergeant-At-Arms
poor dumb ******* die for his country." | Human O-Ring Society

- General George S. Patton, Jr

[Rhonda Lea Kirk]

OM wrote:
> Alan Erskine wrote:
>
>> Thanks, Joe. Richard Katz or OM are the most likely
>> scum doing this.

> ...I made a major mistake where you were concerned, Alan.
> At the advice of someone I considered a friend with a
> rational outlook on things, I took you out of my
> killfile. The truth is obvious - I should have never let
> you out of Killfile Hell, and should have left you there
> to rot.

Just for the record, Bob, I'm sorry. It was very bad advice.
Even for someone not willing to take your lack of
involvement on faith, the evidence indicates it's
unreasonable to target you as the perpetrator.

rl

[[email protected]]

OM <om@our_blessed_lady_mary_of_the_holy_NASA_research _facility.org> wrote in message >...
> On Wed, 9 Jul 2003 17:50:33 +1000, "Alan Erskine"
> > wrote:
>
> >Thanks, Joe. Richard Katz or OM are the most likely scum doing this.
>
> ...You know, up until now you were the victim here. I've defended you,
> and pointed out who the true suspects were in this. And now you go and
> put the blame on *ME*?
>
> [Counts to ten, but gets as far as seven]
>
> No. **** that. And **** you, Alan. And the horse you rode in on.
>
> ...I made a major mistake where you were concerned, Alan. At the
> advice of someone I considered a friend with a rational outlook on
> things, I took you out of my killfile. The truth is obvious - I should
> have never let you out of Killfile Hell, and should have left you
> there to rot.
>
> ...Well, that's a problem easily fixed. All I need to do is send you
> back to Killfile Hell to become John Maxson's bunkmate. And that's
> where you're going as of right now, especially since it'll get rid of
> you *and* your impostor.
>
> <PLONK>
>
> ...Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice. you'd better ****ing
> duck and cover.
>
>
> OM

in your case mosley, "once a fool, always a fool".

[Sam Seiber]

The REAL Alan Erskine wrote:
> Thanks, Joe. Richard Katz or OM are the most likely scum doing this.

I would be VERY much suprised if either guess is correct. Hell, if
OM wanted to bash you, he would do it right here in public and put
his name on it. I don't know who you ****ed off, but I just can't
see either of the two above guys resorting to such crap.

Sam