View Full Version : we have the smoking gun but using which gun
Rusty Barton
July 7th 03, 10:54 PM
Lynndel Humphreys wrote:
> Only if the validity of the tests can be shown. A few
> shots does not a
> hypothesis prove. That is if after hitting the RCC with a
> BB gun and then an
> artillery shell it proves a point.
>
Now let's see what happens when they fire a frozen chicken at the wing.
:^)
Rusty Barton - Antelope, California
--
--
Direct access to this group with http://web2news.com
http://web2news.com/?sci.space.shuttle
To contact in private, remove nn+o4s4pp8amm
Lynndel Humphreys
July 7th 03, 10:57 PM
Only if the validity of the tests can be shown. A few shots does not a
hypothesis prove. That is if after hitting the RCC with a BB gun and then an
artillery shell it proves a point.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Kent Betts
July 8th 03, 06:38 AM
"Lynndel Humphreys" > wrote in message >...
> Only if the validity of the tests can be shown.
Validity. Dear god we must have it. Show us the validity.
The planned hydrofoil attachments will protect the leading edge from
foam damage, not to mention the lower heating made possible by slowing
to sub-sonic flight prior to entry.
Lynndel Humphreys
July 8th 03, 12:20 PM
"Kent Betts" > wrote in message
om...
> "Lynndel Humphreys" > wrote in message
>...
> > Only if the validity of the tests can be shown.
>
> Validity. Dear god we must have it. Show us the validity.
>
> The planned hydrofoil attachments will protect the leading edge from
> foam damage, not to mention the lower heating made possible by slowing
> to sub-sonic flight prior to entry.
No have to add the silica ablative drag chute or wind sock that is extra
charge.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
Lynndel Humphreys
July 8th 03, 12:53 PM
> Validity. Dear god we must have it. Show us the validity.
>
A new mind set. Quite on the set.
Scene opens
There has been no tragedy and they are conducting foam tests using different
procedures and methods. It is already an accepted premise that the RCC can
be damaged but the tests are designed to see what types of damage. So what
is to be learned or concepts changed by such testing.
--CUT---
What you have is a big hole in the RCC caused by a test. This was NOT an
instant replay of the event. SO validity must be proven. You be the judge.
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =-----
vBulletin® v3.6.4, Copyright ©2000-2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.