Marshall Masters' PX Talk Tonight On C2CAM!

[Rudolph_X]

That's right folks! Marshall Masters will be on Coast To Coast AM
tonight, talking about the latest news on Nibiru/Planet_X.

Marshall Masters, a former CNN Science Features news producer, freelance
writer, television analyst and the publisher of YOWUSA.COM
<http://www.yowusa.com/>, will discuss his research into Planet X, crop
circles, and aliens.

It appears that Masters has taken up the gauntlet that was so limply
dropped by Nancy when her Planet_X predictions failed to materialize.
Now, Masters, in his new book on the subject, is saying that Nancy was
wrong, and that the real flyby date will be on 2012. It now appears that
Masters has single handedly revived what appeared to be a dead topic
here on sci.astro!

Looks like we have another 9 years, or so, to debate this topic ad
infinitum! Ha!

[Wally Anglesea™]

On Mon, 04 Aug 2003 02:36:17 GMT, Rudolph_X >
wrote:

>
>
>Rudolph_X wrote:
>
>> That's right folks! Marshall Masters will be on Coast To Coast AM
>> tonight, talking about the latest news on Nibiru/Planet_X.
>>
>> Marshall Masters, a former CNN Science Features news producer,
>> freelance writer, television analyst and the publisher of YOWUSA.COM
>> <http://www.yowusa.com/>, will discuss his research into Planet X,
>> crop circles, and aliens.
>>
>> It appears that Masters has taken up the gauntlet that was so limply
>> dropped by Nancy when her Planet_X predictions failed to materialize.
>> Now, Masters, in his new book on the subject, is saying that Nancy was
>> wrong, and that the real flyby date will be on 2012. It now appears
>> that Masters has single handedly revived what appeared to be a dead
>> topic here on sci.astro!

No, *you* are trying to flog a dead horse. Having been humiliated over
Planet X, you are back for more. Yet you, just like Marshall,(who
knows a good scam when he sees one, I'll give him that much), will
continuously refuse or be incapable of showing any evidence whatsoever
for your mythical planet.


>>
>> Looks like we have another 9 years, or so, to debate this topic ad
>> infinitum! Ha!

Correction. You have another 5 years or so to come up with another
lame assed excuse when once again, the mythical non-existant Planet
X/Nibiru fails to show up.

I'll remind you, so make sure you have your excuses ready.

For the Truth about Planet X,
Phil Plait's excellent summary:
http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/misc/planetx/index.html

[Mac]

Rudolph X spewed forth:
> Now, Masters, in his new book on the subject, is saying that Nancy was
> wrong, and that the real flyby date will be on 2012. It now appears
> that Masters has single handedly revived what appeared to be a dead
> topic here on sci.astro!
SNIP SNIP
***************** ***********
Well, he is smart enough to realize how stupide and easily
deluded people as yourself lack any basic knowledge of science
and he is smart enough to set the so-called arrival so far off
that he should glean a nice enough income for a while from the
gullible who seek something "unique" to set them apart from
others, just to justify their empty lives.

These are the kind of people who can not accept the wonder of
Reality, and can not find ways to fill their lives with work or
charity but must desperately grasp at the ideal of planet
catastrophe to energize their being.
Amazing.
---Mac

[Thomas McDonald]

"Rudolph_X" > wrote in message
...
>That's right folks! Marshall Masters will be on Coast To Coast AM tonight,
talking about the latest news on Nibiru/Planet_X.

>Marshall Masters, a former CNN Science Features news producer, freelance
writer, television analyst and the publisher of YOWUSA.COM, will discuss his
research into Planet X, crop circles, and aliens.

>It appears that Masters has taken up the gauntlet that was so limply
dropped by Nancy when her Planet_X predictions failed to materialize. Now,
Masters, in his new book on the subject, is saying that Nancy was wrong, and
that the real flyby date will be on 2012. It now appears that Masters has
single handedly revived what appeared to be a dead topic here on sci.astro!

>Looks like we have another 9 years, or so, to debate this topic ad
infinitum! Ha!

Rudy, old ****-stirrer,

2012 was one of the most popular bets as to what you moronic
zetababbling motherlovers would fall back on when the beloved Nancy turned
out to be as fruitty a cake as we all said she was. I fully expect you and
the rest of the woo-woo brigade to continue your childish, demanding and
off-topic ways; and this bull**** from you is probably just the start.

We will be treated to many, many claims, hosts of foul names for being
skeptical of those claims, and a complete absence of scientific evidence
that can stand scientific scrutiny. Like what the "sci." in "sci.astro"
stands for. You, of course, will pretend to be above it all, while in fact
being both a flaky believer and an instigator of unpleasantness.

Go away, silly person, before I taunt you again. I fart in your general
direction.

Tom McDonald

P.S.: Does your father still **** hamsters after eating elderberries?

TSM

[Fred Garvin]

On Sun, 03 Aug 2003 22:35:03 -0400, Rudolph_X wrote:

> <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html>


*PLONK*